Called 'too broad' The WARF patents have been controversial since they were issued in 1998 and 2001. The first one covers embryonic stem cells from primates, the second one specifically from humans. Embryonic stem cells are believed capable of turning into all 220 types of cells in the body, from bone to kidney to brain. Scientists hope to use them to replace or repair tissue that is damaged or diseased, in conditions such as Parkinson's disease, diabetes, stroke and spinal cord injury. Gulbrandsen said he respects the intellectual argument against patenting human life that some have raised. "I would be willing to say, maybe you shouldn't," he said. But he said WARF had to file the patents based on Thomson's work. The five stem-cell lines Thomson developed are among the 22 available for federal funding under Bush's policy - but are used in research more than many of the others. A federal law prohibited government funding for Thomson's research in the 1990s, so Thomson accepted funding from the company Geron, Gulbrandsen said. If WARF hadn't filed the patents, Geron would have, and that would have made it even more difficult for other researchers to access the cells today, he said. "We really didn't have a choice," he said. Has shared cells WARF has lived up to its promise to share the cells with other researchers, said spokesman Andy Cohn. The foundation has shipped cells to more than 300 research groups in 21 countries and trained more than 360 researchers on how to grow the cells, Cohn said. It charged $5,000 to each group until last fall, when a National Institutes of Health subsidy helped lower the price to $500, he said. The price for private labs is steeper - up to $125,000, plus an annual maintenance fee. On top of those distribution arrangements, WARF has licensing agreements with a dozen research companies covering commercial uses of stem cells. And if CIRM were to commercialize their research by taking a cut of the profits then the companies that partner with researchers funded by the institute could be subject to these higher WARF licensing fees. WARF must act on its patents in California to protect the licenses, Gulbrandsen said. "If we don't, (the licensees are) going to say, why are we paying money to WARF?" he said. WARF won't disclose how much money the licenses bring in, but Cohn said the funds have been put back into research and facilities on the UW-Madison campus. The patents could eventually yield millions of dollars, but they expire within a dozen years and it's not clear if stem-cell therapies will be available by then, Cohn said. Simpson, of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in California, said his calls for CIRM or other entities in California to sue WARF over the patents have not led to any action. "There's nothing definite right now," he said. Money is blocked CIRM, meanwhile, has been stymied by other lawsuits. Opponents of embryonic stem-cell research, who claim it destroys human life, have blocked distribution of the $3 billion in state funds. To get around those lawsuits, CIRM issued special bond notes in April after receiving pledges for funds from foundations and trusts. That allowed CIRM to make its first awards that month: $12.1 million in training grants to 16 universities and other institutions. But CIRM has not yet awarded any research grants. Gulbrandsen said WARF's talks with CIRM continue - and since little money has been awarded, there is time to negotiate a truce. One possibility, said CIRM's Maxon, is that the institute might pursue an omnibus license with WARF that would apply to all of its grantees and commercial partners. (责任编辑:泉水) |